Monsanto Lobbying On Pace To New Records In 2010

Monsanto Co. spent $4.64 million in the first two quarters of 2010 and it is on pace to set a new high for its lobbying expenditures. This has been fueled by lobbying on an increasing number of legal and legislative issues affecting the world’s largest conventional and biotech seed manufacturer.

Lobbying federal government on proposed changes to U.S. patent law that are part of Patent Reform Act of 2010 were among the top concerns for the company. Patents are vital to the company that has re-invented itself around selling patented genetically modified seeds. Over the past decade Monsanto has aggressively sought to patent and protect genetic plant material and to acquire companies controlling genetically modified seed patents. Also, it has spent heavily to prosecute seed patent violators, including, most notoriously, small farmers who had inadvertently grown Monsanto’s GM seeds.

It is Monsanto’s use of patents and licensing that is currently under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice. Government lawyers are looking into whether Monsanto violated antitrust laws through its tight control of patented and conventional genes for all four major industrial crops grown in the U.S., including corn, soybeans, canola, and cotton. Not surprisingly, in the first half of 2010 Monsanto has lobbied on issues concerning antitrust and consolidation in agriculture.

Monsanto also lobbied the U.S. Department of Agriculture on approval of genetically modified crops, such as RoundUp Ready alfalfa and RoundUp Ready sugar beets. These crops were the focus of lawsuits and have threatened company’s ability to slip in approvals of genetically modified crops with little environmental scrutiny, as has often been the case in the past, and they had resulted in what could be viewed as significant legal setbacks to the company and as key victories for anti-GMO advocates.

Another target on the lobbying docket for Monsanto was global trade and promotion of biotechnology around the world. It’s lobbying efforts to numerous federal departments, the White House and Congress members focused on eliminating EU moratorium on biotech imports. Monsanto has sought to break down regulatory barriers to biotech trade and to further acceptance of agricultural biotechnologies on every continent and with virtually every major importer of U.S. agricultural products, from Far East Asia in Japan, China, and Korea, to India, Pakistan and Turkey, to Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Columbia and Chile in South America, to Mexico, Canada, Australia, and a host of other countries all over the globe.

In the first half of the year, Monsanto’s lobbying spending was up from $3.36 million during the same period last year.

Monsanto lobbied the U.S. Congress, the White House, the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Trade Representative Office, and the U.S. Departments of State, Interior, Commerce, and Defense, and the Patent & Trademark Office.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Monsanto Lobbying On Pace To New Records In 2010 -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: Monsanto Lobbying On Pace To New Records In 2010 « GMO Journal

  • http://zorach.wordpress.com/ Alex Zorach

    I’ve been researching Monsanto and their herbicide Roundup a lot in the past couple days, as background for writing about herbicide use by the city of Newark, Delaware.

    Monsanto’s track record speaks for itself: they have been convicted twice of false advertising for overstating the safety. When I started delving into the scientific literature too, I found that there are some rather complex reasons for the misinformation surrounding Roundup’s safety. Monsanto often cites studies of the active ingredient alone, glyphosate. But in reality, the mixture as a whole is much more damaging to the environment and much more hazardous to human health, because of effects from other “inactive” ingredients. Check out my blog post if you want some more rigorous research and links to these studies.

  • Elva McGhee

    It’s so hard to believe that Monsanto is pushing something that will change every human being in our future years, our own children’s children. The research is there. This is not right.

  • Sophie

    Monsato = EVIL!!!

  • http://gmo-journal.com Deniza Gertsberg

    Thank you for the interest and the comments. Alex, I’ll check out your article. Thanks!

  • Pingback: USDA’s Response To A Ban On Monsanto’s GM Sugar Beets Is Unlawful « GMO Journal

  • Pingback: Food and Education - A Natural Place to Start

  • Pingback: Is Certified Organic Always Non-GMO? « plantcentric

  • Pingback: Is Organic Always GMO Free? | GMO Awareness